I was invited to attend Creation fest few days ago by my very Christian friend. I enjoyed it immensely, the music was talented and diverse with R&B, Rap, Reggae, Rock and all sorts being pumped out of the stage and cafes. I met many nice people and I kind of found myself admiring the 'purity' of their intentions. Of course there was a sunday service, and an American preacher made his characteristically very charismatic speech about sin and nonbelieving and so on. So he asked the audience something along the lines of: "Is there anyone out there who has accepted the message of Jesus into their hearts? If so put your hand up. If you are afraid to put your hand up in front of other Christians, would you face telling colleagues at work you are a Christian? Put your hand up and we will pray for you." And then he points them over to someone giving out 'Beginner's Bibles'.
So how did I react to his speech? I listened carefully to his every word and ran this really annoying little debate in my head. Unfortunately for the 'converters' of Christianity, I made the rational decision that I do NOT have to believe in God or Jesus in order to be a good man. Buddhism has proved that spectacularly. Of course Jesus most likely did exist, but merely as a philosopher. His teachings are special, but not any more special than those of Confucious for example. And the belief in God is irrational, leading to Christians being very intolerant of proved fact such as Darwin's Natural Selection. So I left the festival unaffected, with my 'own beliefs' completely rock solid, like the house built on the rock!
Nevertheless, Christianity is a pretty good method of control for unintelligent and insecure people who would otherwise lead an uncaring, hedonistic life. The theological fear of God and hell etc. ensures total control. Why do you think the story of Jesus bearing all our sins on the cross is regularly preached? It means the worst of the worst will redeem themselves and become a positive addition to society. In fact, I sincerely believe my friend would have been off the rocks in depression and perhaps violence if it wasn't for Christianity. Even so, he is still insecure at the present. You don't usually see the snapping point in a person but with this friend of mine, you can imagine it quite accurately.
I haven't even reached the point of this post yet actually. NEPT as I like to call it is kind of a little formulation of my ideas into English. Being quite abstract, I guess the best way to understand NEPT is to watch Neon Genesis Evangelion and End of Evangelion, read many many forums on the web, leave a couple of months, watch it again and then read more forums. Then you may end up with the same mindset as me, wear Misato's Cross around your neck all 365 days of the year (it arrived in the post a week ago yay) and think stupidly that you are the wisest man on the planet.
Anyway here we go (work in progress by the way!):
Nonexistence of Egos in Paradise Thesis
1: The Kingdom of Heaven is believed to be the absolute paradise.
2: When a person dies, they may enter the Kingdom of Heaven if they believe in Jesus.
If heaven is an absolute paradise, then no 'sin' exists. For as long as humans are separate egos, it is not possible for a 'universal perception' to exist. Therefore perceptions differ and clash on certain aspects. This clash of perception gives rise to the concept of 'good and evil'; the latter often referred to as sin. Hence if humans enter Heaven as humans (egos), Heaven cannot be called an absolute paradise. And therefore that paradise is not the residence of God.
In order to enter the so called Heaven, the ego must break down. Therefore, nothing human nor conscious exists in Heaven. Only God.
God is dead. God hasn't died nor has he always been dead. He is death itself.